Crítica al control de convencionalidad secundario realizado por la Corte IDH en el caso Artavia Murillo vs. Costa Rica en la interpretación del artículo 4.1 de la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos
SUMMARY: This investigation, analyzes the judgment handed down by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Artavia Murillo vs. Costa Rica, in order to determine whether the international court submitted itself, as was its duty, to the American Convention on Human Rights and other internatio...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8500584 |
| Source: | Saber y Justicia, ISSN 2305-2589, Vol. 2, Nº. 18, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Saber y Justicia), pags. 63-83 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
SUMMARY:
This investigation, analyzes the judgment handed down by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Artavia Murillo vs. Costa Rica, in order to determine whether the international court submitted itself, as was its duty, to the American Convention on Human Rights and other international human rights instruments, pertinent to the case, and whether it carried out that control of conventionality that requires the States, but to which it is also bound.
The investigation shows how, despite how much is expected from an international tribunal on human rights, it may also violate the American Convention, but without any possibility for those affected, to obtain review of the ruling, since the resolutions of the Inter-American Court are final. |
|---|