El formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre Jori y Schauer
This essay examines and juxtaposes Mario Jori’s and Frederick Schauer’s ideas on legal formalism. Although developed independently of each other, these ideas show remarkable similarities: both focus on the notion of norm or rule as a tool for clarifying the notion of legal formalism; both defend leg...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6188374 |
| Source: | Derecho PUCP: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 2305-2546, Nº. 79, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La importancia de la Filosofía del Derecho en el razonamiento jurídico), pags. 47-75 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001232733
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Derecho PUCP: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 2305-2546, Nº. 79, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La importancia de la Filosofía del Derecho en el razonamiento jurídico), pags. 47-75
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
legal formalism
Mario Jori Frederick Schauer legal rule legal reasoning legal texts interpretation defeasibility constitutional legal orders formalismo jurídico Mario Jori Frederick Schauer norma jurídica razonamiento jurídico texto jurídico interpretación derrotabilidad Estado constitucional de derecho formalismo giuridico Mario Jori Frederick Schauer norma giuridica ragionamento giuridico testo giuridico interpretazione defettibilità stato costituzionale di diritto |
| spellingShingle |
legal formalism
Mario Jori Frederick Schauer legal rule legal reasoning legal texts interpretation defeasibility constitutional legal orders formalismo jurídico Mario Jori Frederick Schauer norma jurídica razonamiento jurídico texto jurídico interpretación derrotabilidad Estado constitucional de derecho formalismo giuridico Mario Jori Frederick Schauer norma giuridica ragionamento giuridico testo giuridico interpretazione defettibilità stato costituzionale di diritto Pintore, Anna El formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre Jori y Schauer |
| description |
This essay examines and juxtaposes Mario Jori’s and Frederick Schauer’s ideas on legal formalism. Although developed independently of each other, these ideas show remarkable similarities: both focus on the notion of norm or rule as a tool for clarifying the notion of legal formalism; both defend legal formalism from the criticisms routinely moved against it. The author maintains that Jori’s and Schauer’s theories may contribute to shed light on (and criticize) the controversial notion of defeasibility of legal rules; they may also contribute to scale down, from a legal-theoretical point of view, the novelties of contemporary constitutional orders; finally, it may help to better understand their working machinery.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Pintore, Anna
|
| author_facet |
Pintore, Anna
|
| author_sort |
Pintore, Anna
|
| title |
El formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre Jori y Schauer
|
| title_short |
El formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre Jori y Schauer
|
| title_full |
El formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre Jori y Schauer
|
| title_fullStr |
El formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre Jori y Schauer
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
El formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre Jori y Schauer
|
| title_sort |
el formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre jori y schauer
|
| publishDate |
2017
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6188374
|
| _version_ |
1709746490592722944
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012327332017-11-25El formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre Jori y SchauerPintore, Annalegal formalismMario JoriFrederick Schauerlegal rulelegal reasoninglegal textsinterpretationdefeasibilityconstitutional legal ordersformalismo jurídicoMario JoriFrederick Schauernorma jurídicarazonamiento jurídicotexto jurídicointerpretaciónderrotabilidadEstado constitucional de derechoformalismo giuridicoMario JoriFrederick Schauernorma giuridicaragionamento giuridicotesto giuridicointerpretazionedefettibilitàstato costituzionale di dirittoThis essay examines and juxtaposes Mario Jori’s and Frederick Schauer’s ideas on legal formalism. Although developed independently of each other, these ideas show remarkable similarities: both focus on the notion of norm or rule as a tool for clarifying the notion of legal formalism; both defend legal formalism from the criticisms routinely moved against it. The author maintains that Jori’s and Schauer’s theories may contribute to shed light on (and criticize) the controversial notion of defeasibility of legal rules; they may also contribute to scale down, from a legal-theoretical point of view, the novelties of contemporary constitutional orders; finally, it may help to better understand their working machinery.In questo saggio vengono esaminate e messe a confronto le idee di Mario Jori e di Frederick Schauer in tema di formalismo giuridico. Pur essendo state elaborate l’una indipendentemente dall’altra, presentano notevoli somiglianze, perché entrambe usano la nozione di norma o regola come punto focale per chiarire la nozione di formalismo giuridico, e perché entrambe difendono quest’ultimo dalle critiche usualmente rivolte ad esso. L’autrice ritiene che l’esame delle idee dei due autori possa contribuire a chiarire (e criticare) la controversa nozione di defeasibility delle norme giuridiche e possa altresì, in via generale, contribuire a ridimensionare, dal punto di vista teorico-giuridico, le novità del diritto degli odierni Stati costituzionali, oltre che a comprenderne meglio i meccanismi di funzionamento.En este trabajo se examina y compara las ideas de Mario Jori y de Frederick Schauer en relación con el formalismo jurídico. A pesar de haber sido desarrolladas de forma independiente unas de las otras, dichas ideas presentan notables semejanzas ya que ambos autores utilizan el concepto de una norma o regla como punto focal para aclarar la noción de formalismo jurídico, y porque ambos lo defienden de las críticas que usualmente se le dirigen. La autora considera que el examen de las ideas de los dos autores puede contribuir a aclarar (y criticar) la controvertida noción de defeasibility (derrotabilidad) de las normas jurídicas y, de modo general, también a redimensionar, desde el punto de vista teórico-jurídico, las novedades que presentan los derechos de los modernos Estados constitucionales, y comprender mejor los mecanismos de su funcionamiento.2017text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6188374(Revista) ISSN 0251-3420(Revista) ISSN 2305-2546Derecho PUCP: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 2305-2546, Nº. 79, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La importancia de la Filosofía del Derecho en el razonamiento jurídico), pags. 47-75spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|