El formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre Jori y Schauer

This essay examines and juxtaposes Mario Jori’s and Frederick Schauer’s ideas on legal formalism. Although developed independently of each other, these ideas show remarkable similarities: both focus on the notion of norm or rule as a tool for clarifying the notion of legal formalism; both defend leg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pintore, Anna
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2017
Subjects:
legal formalism
Mario Jori
Frederick Schauer
legal rule
legal reasoning
legal texts
interpretation
defeasibility
constitutional legal orders
formalismo jurídico
norma jurídica
razonamiento jurídico
texto jurídico
interpretación
derrotabilidad
Estado constitucional de derecho
formalismo giuridico
norma giuridica
ragionamento giuridico
testo giuridico
interpretazione
defettibilità
stato costituzionale di diritto
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6188374
Source:Derecho PUCP: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 2305-2546, Nº. 79, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La importancia de la Filosofía del Derecho en el razonamiento jurídico), pags. 47-75
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
El formalismo jurídico: un cotejo entre Jori y Schauer
Summary: This essay examines and juxtaposes Mario Jori’s and Frederick Schauer’s ideas on legal formalism. Although developed independently of each other, these ideas show remarkable similarities: both focus on the notion of norm or rule as a tool for clarifying the notion of legal formalism; both defend legal formalism from the criticisms routinely moved against it. The author maintains that Jori’s and Schauer’s theories may contribute to shed light on (and criticize) the controversial notion of defeasibility of legal rules; they may also contribute to scale down, from a legal-theoretical point of view, the novelties of contemporary constitutional orders; finally, it may help to better understand their working machinery.

Similar Items