Las facultades de la empresa de videovigilancia de sus trabajadores. Comentario a la stc 39/2016, de 3 de marzo
The Court Ruling that we are analyzing changes the legal criteria that had been established in previous statements, regarding the powers of the company to monitor compliance with labor obligations of their employees, through video surveillance. Prior statements emphasized the need for workers to kno...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5776257 |
| Source: | Revista Boliviana de Derecho, ISSN 2070-8157, Nº. 23, 2017, pags. 366-373 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
The Court Ruling that we are analyzing changes the legal criteria that had been established in previous
statements, regarding the powers of the company to monitor compliance with labor obligations of their employees,
through video surveillance. Prior statements emphasized the need for workers to know, not only the fact of the
existence of camcorders, but also that the cameras were intended for the enforcement of labor obligations and,
therefore, the possibility of the company to penalize workers based on the images obtained. Now, however, the High
Court allows the existence of hidden or covert video cameras, when there are grounds for suspicion of a breach of
labor obligations by a worker. |
|---|