Diagnóstico al desempeño de la Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonora, 1992-2012
This article examines the performance of the State Commission for Human Rights Sonora (CEDHS) during its 20 years of work, 1992-2012. The literature on the performance of the human rights commissions and the regulations that govern them underline that the “reconciliation” should be the preferent ins...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5649450 |
| Source: | Revista legislativa de estudios sociales y de opinión pública, Vol. 9, Nº. 17, 2016, pags. 71-100 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001032042
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00010320422016-09-30Diagnóstico al desempeño de la Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonora, 1992-2012Nicasio Lagunes López, ÓscarNoriega Esparza, Guillermodiagnósticoderechos humanosconclusión de quejasconciliacionesrecomendacionesComisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonoradiagnostichuman rightsconclusion of complaintsconciliationsrecommendationsState Commission for Human Rights of SonoraThis article examines the performance of the State Commission for Human Rights Sonora (CEDHS) during its 20 years of work, 1992-2012. The literature on the performance of the human rights commissions and the regulations that govern them underline that the “reconciliation” should be the preferent instrument of these bodies to conclude the omplaints they receive each year. However, the statistical processing of the data from the CEDHS annual reports of activities shows that the most used instrument to conclude the complaints is the “resolution through the process”. Also, while the number of complaints increases each year, the recommendations made and the reconciliations decrease annually, which would mean the detection of few violations of human rights. Finally, the percentage of completed complaints has dropped dramatically over the past eight years, which reveals poor management of the Sonoran CommissionEste artículo examina el desempeño de la Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonora (CEDHS) durante sus 20 años de labores, 1992-2012. La literatura sobre el desempeño de las comisiones de derechos humanos y la normatividad que las rige subrayan que las “conciliaciones” deben ser el instrumento favorito de estos organismos para concluir las quejas que reciben. Sin embargo, el procesamiento estadístico de los datos de los informes anuales de actividades de la CEDHS pone de manifi esto que el instrumento preferido para concluir las quejas recibidas es la “resolución mediante el trámite”. Además, mientras el número de quejas recibidas incrementa cada año, las recomendaciones y las conciliaciones emitidas decrecen, lo que significaría la detección de pocas violaciones a los derechos humanos. Por último, el porcentaje de quejas concluidas se ha reducido drásticamente en los últimos ocho años, lo que revela una gestión defi ciente de la Comisión sonorense2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5649450Revista legislativa de estudios sociales y de opinión pública, Vol. 9, Nº. 17, 2016, pags. 71-100spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista legislativa de estudios sociales y de opinión pública, Vol. 9, Nº. 17, 2016, pags. 71-100
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
diagnóstico
derechos humanos conclusión de quejas conciliaciones recomendaciones Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonora diagnostic human rights conclusion of complaints conciliations recommendations State Commission for Human Rights of Sonora |
| spellingShingle |
diagnóstico
derechos humanos conclusión de quejas conciliaciones recomendaciones Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonora diagnostic human rights conclusion of complaints conciliations recommendations State Commission for Human Rights of Sonora Nicasio Lagunes López, Óscar Noriega Esparza, Guillermo Diagnóstico al desempeño de la Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonora, 1992-2012 |
| description |
This article examines the performance of the State Commission for Human Rights Sonora (CEDHS) during its 20 years of work, 1992-2012. The literature on the performance of the human rights commissions and the regulations that govern them underline that the “reconciliation” should be the preferent instrument of these bodies to conclude the omplaints they receive each year. However, the statistical processing of the data from the CEDHS annual reports of activities shows that the most used instrument to conclude the complaints is the “resolution through the process”. Also, while the number of complaints
increases each year, the recommendations made and the reconciliations decrease annually, which would mean the detection of few violations of human rights. Finally, the percentage of completed complaints has dropped dramatically over the past eight years, which reveals poor management of the Sonoran Commission
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Nicasio Lagunes López, Óscar
Noriega Esparza, Guillermo |
| author_facet |
Nicasio Lagunes López, Óscar
Noriega Esparza, Guillermo |
| author_sort |
Nicasio Lagunes López, Óscar
|
| title |
Diagnóstico al desempeño de la Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonora, 1992-2012
|
| title_short |
Diagnóstico al desempeño de la Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonora, 1992-2012
|
| title_full |
Diagnóstico al desempeño de la Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonora, 1992-2012
|
| title_fullStr |
Diagnóstico al desempeño de la Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonora, 1992-2012
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Diagnóstico al desempeño de la Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos de Sonora, 1992-2012
|
| title_sort |
diagnóstico al desempeño de la comisión estatal de derechos humanos de sonora, 1992-2012
|
| publishDate |
2016
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5649450
|
| _version_ |
1709744596898021376
|