O acesso à justiça por meio da adequada técnica processual e duração razoável do processo.

Access to justice through the proper procedural technique to ensure the reasonable duration of the process is the subject of this work. The proposed objective is to discuss and clarify the institutes of procedural flexibility, access to justice, legal certainty, protection and transindividual altern...

Deskribapen osoa

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile nagusia: Sampaio Fuga, Bruno Augusto
Formatua: Artikulua
Hizkuntza:Portugalera
Argitaratua: Del Blanco Editores 2012
Sarrera elektronikoa:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4406965
Baliabidea:Riedpa: Revista Internacional de Estudios de Derecho Procesal y Arbitraje, ISSN 1989-3892, Nº. 3, 201224 pags.
Etiketak: Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
Laburpena: Access to justice through the proper procedural technique to ensure the reasonable duration of the process is the subject of this work. The proposed objective is to discuss and clarify the institutes of procedural flexibility, access to justice, legal certainty, protection and transindividual alternative means, as possible solutions to ensure access to justice and the reasonable duration of the process. The justification is the relevance of the topic and institutes here treated and researched to achieve the effectiveness of the rights pleaded. The slowness of the judiciary and difficulties in access to justice are factors that can reflect on the economic aspects of the country and consequently in all citizens. Analyze comparative law, including the French, New Zealand and Portuguese is of fundamental importance to theoretical and practical knowledge, as the experience of other countries used to face the same questions can be of great importance. The questions researched and analyzed in this paper are also relevant innovations and legal problems of contemporaneity, in view of the plurality of society and the large number of lawsuits currently proposed in paternal judiciary.