Sobre la Constitución viviente

The author discusses the debate between living constitutionalism and originalism in legal theory in the United States. While the originalists believe that it is necessary to interpret the Constitution in accordance with the beliefs of the founding fathers and the actual text, the living constitution...

Deskribapen osoa

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile nagusia: Carbonell Sánchez, Miguel
Formatua: Artikulua
Hizkuntza:Gaztelania
Argitaratua: Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana 2012
Gaiak:
constitucionalismo
interpretación constitucional
constitución viviente
activismo judicial
sistema de precedente
constitutionalism
constitutional interpretation
living constitution
judicial activism
stare decisis
interpretação constitucional
constituição vivente
ativismo jurídico
constitutionnalisme
interprétation constitutionnelle
Constitution Vivante
activisme judiciaire
système du précèdent judiciaire
Sarrera elektronikoa:http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4279448
Baliabidea:Revista Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, ISSN 0120-3886, Nº. 117, 2012, pags. 347-357
Etiketak: Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
Sobre la Constitución viviente
Laburpena: The author discusses the debate between living constitutionalism and originalism in legal theory in the United States. While the originalists believe that it is necessary to interpret the Constitution in accordance with the beliefs of the founding fathers and the actual text, the living constitutionalists, on the contrary, believe that the interpretation should be adapted to the current context. The author supports the thesis of living constitutionalism and following Strauss arguments, he shows the weaknesses and inconveniences of originalism.

Antzeko agiriak