Sobre la Constitución viviente

The author discusses the debate between living constitutionalism and originalism in legal theory in the United States. While the originalists believe that it is necessary to interpret the Constitution in accordance with the beliefs of the founding fathers and the actual text, the living constitution...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carbonell Sánchez, Miguel
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4279448
Source:Revista Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, ISSN 0120-3886, Nº. 117, 2012, pags. 347-357
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: The author discusses the debate between living constitutionalism and originalism in legal theory in the United States. While the originalists believe that it is necessary to interpret the Constitution in accordance with the beliefs of the founding fathers and the actual text, the living constitutionalists, on the contrary, believe that the interpretation should be adapted to the current context. The author supports the thesis of living constitutionalism and following Strauss arguments, he shows the weaknesses and inconveniences of originalism.