Ubi finitur armorum vis. Ontologia e geometria politica nel dibattito moderno sulla sovranità dei mari (1355-1782)
Throughout the course of the modern age, legal-political philosophy has been challenged by the problem of the freedom or sovereignty of the seas. After the solutions initially proposed by Bartolus of Saxoferrato and Baldus de Ubaldis to establish the exact extension of the territorial sea, the debat...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Italian |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8887072 |
Source: | Jura Gentium: Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale, ISSN 1826-8269, Vol. 19, Nº. 2, 2022, pags. 7-21 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001590328
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015903282023-04-14Ubi finitur armorum vis. Ontologia e geometria politica nel dibattito moderno sulla sovranità dei mari (1355-1782)Sferrazza Papa, ErnestoseaGrotiusSeldensovereigntypowerThroughout the course of the modern age, legal-political philosophy has been challenged by the problem of the freedom or sovereignty of the seas. After the solutions initially proposed by Bartolus of Saxoferrato and Baldus de Ubaldis to establish the exact extension of the territorial sea, the debate became paradigmatic thanks to the querelle between Grotius (author of Mare liberum) and Selden (author of Mare clausum). The dispute continued with the analyses of Paolo Sarpi, Cornelius van Bynkershoek, Immanuel Kant and Ferdinando Galiani. The controversy over territorial seas is one of the crucial moments of the modern age. In it, the relationship between the agency of the subject and the space is radically rethought, proposing two theoretical diagrams: an ontological-political one, in which the subject is a function of the space; a geometrical-political one, in which the space is a function of the subject. The essay traces this debate identifying the theoretical issues on which it is based.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8887072(Revista) ISSN 1826-8269Jura Gentium: Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale, ISSN 1826-8269, Vol. 19, Nº. 2, 2022, pags. 7-21itaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Jura Gentium: Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale, ISSN 1826-8269, Vol. 19, Nº. 2, 2022, pags. 7-21
|
language |
Italian
|
topic |
sea
Grotius Selden sovereignty power |
spellingShingle |
sea
Grotius Selden sovereignty power Sferrazza Papa, Ernesto Ubi finitur armorum vis. Ontologia e geometria politica nel dibattito moderno sulla sovranità dei mari (1355-1782) |
description |
Throughout the course of the modern age, legal-political philosophy has been challenged by the problem of the freedom or sovereignty of the seas. After the solutions initially proposed by Bartolus of Saxoferrato and Baldus de Ubaldis to establish the exact extension of the territorial sea, the debate became paradigmatic thanks to the querelle between Grotius (author of Mare liberum) and Selden (author of Mare clausum). The dispute continued with the analyses of Paolo Sarpi, Cornelius van Bynkershoek, Immanuel Kant and Ferdinando Galiani. The controversy over territorial seas is one of the crucial moments of the modern age. In it, the relationship between the agency of the subject and the space is radically rethought, proposing two theoretical diagrams: an ontological-political one, in which the subject is a function of the space; a geometrical-political one, in which the space is a function of the subject. The essay traces this debate identifying the theoretical issues on which it is based.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Sferrazza Papa, Ernesto
|
author_facet |
Sferrazza Papa, Ernesto
|
author_sort |
Sferrazza Papa, Ernesto
|
title |
Ubi finitur armorum vis. Ontologia e geometria politica nel dibattito moderno sulla sovranità dei mari (1355-1782)
|
title_short |
Ubi finitur armorum vis. Ontologia e geometria politica nel dibattito moderno sulla sovranità dei mari (1355-1782)
|
title_full |
Ubi finitur armorum vis. Ontologia e geometria politica nel dibattito moderno sulla sovranità dei mari (1355-1782)
|
title_fullStr |
Ubi finitur armorum vis. Ontologia e geometria politica nel dibattito moderno sulla sovranità dei mari (1355-1782)
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Ubi finitur armorum vis. Ontologia e geometria politica nel dibattito moderno sulla sovranità dei mari (1355-1782)
|
title_sort |
ubi finitur armorum vis. ontologia e geometria politica nel dibattito moderno sulla sovranità dei mari (1355-1782)
|
publishDate |
2022
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8887072
|
_version_ |
1763296473035833344
|