Revisión Bibliométrica de la Gestión del Conocimiento Tradicional
Purpose. The first document dates from 1980, it reappears in 1993, in 2000 it increases significantly. Out of 2,813 researchers, Berker, Turner and Tëngo stand out. The largest citation and production is from India and the United States. It is concluded that it is necessary to know the degree to whi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8804983 |
| Source: | Scientia et PRAXIS, ISSN 2954-4041, Vol. 1, Nº. 1, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: First Semester of 2021) |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
Purpose. The first document dates from 1980, it reappears in 1993, in 2000 it increases significantly. Out of 2,813 researchers, Berker, Turner and Tëngo stand out. The largest citation and production is from India and the United States. It is concluded that it is necessary to know the degree to which the traditional knowledge of the populations is legitimized by describing and evaluating it for the creation of alternatives, as well as the degree to which populations, institutions or organizations combine local experience and science.
Methodology. The traditional Knowledge Management search in Scopus using VosViewer software, generated 941 documents, 78% articles, 8% reviews and 6.8% book chapters. In Social Sciences 22.9%, Environmental Sciences 20.1% and Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15.8%.
Findings and originality. It is necessary to know how the integration of traditional knowledge in science and technology affects indicators of sustainability, resilience, common welfare, creation of social value and other variables related to social and environmental ecosystems. |
|---|