Editorial – An overview on the “crisis” of testimonial evidence as a judicial decision making tool, between ECHR and Italian Criminal Proceeding: : protected witnesses, media interference, principle of immediacy and right to cross-examination.

We know that science is a precious ally for the judge in the search for truth. But we also know that every coin has its flipside. Science can in fact constitute a false ally for the judge, dangerously channeling the process towards judicial error. The matter is well known. Criminal justice now draws...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paulesu, Pier Paolo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Criminal Trial
Adversarial system
Judicial efficiency and procedural speed
Testimonial Evidence
The right of the accused to examine the witnesses against him
Protected victims
Anonimous witnesses
Media witnesses
Contradictory
orality
immediacy
Appeal judgement and testimonial evidence
processo penal
sistema adversarial
eficiência judicial e celeridade procedimental
prova testemunhal
direito do acusado ao exame cruzado
vítimas protegias
testemunhas anônimas
testemunhas midiáticas
contraditório
oralidade
imediação
julgamento em apelação e prova testemunhal
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8739199
Source:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 8, Nº. 3, 2022
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Editorial – An overview on the “crisis” of testimonial evidence as a judicial decision making tool, between ECHR and Italian Criminal Proceeding: : protected witnesses, media interference, principle of immediacy and right to cross-examination.
  • Get full text

    • Similar Items