Monopolio, mercado de servicios jurídicos y acceso a la justicia: notas para un futuro debate
Lack of access to justice, especially for the most vulnerable population, is an urgent problem for countries such as Colombia. Public pro-bono legal aid programs do not seem to offer sufficient or effective services. Other jurisdictions that face the same situation have started adopting different me...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8409282 |
| Source: | Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 78, Nº. 172, 2021, pags. 148-174 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001527240
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015272402022-04-28Monopolio, mercado de servicios jurídicos y acceso a la justicia: notas para un futuro debateAnzola Rodríguez, Sergio IvánAcceso a la justiciaprofesión jurídicaCorte Constitucionalabogadosservicios jurídicosAccess to justicelegal professionConstitutional CourtMonopolyLegal ServicesAcesso à justiçaProfissão jurídicaSupremo Tribunal FederalAdvogadosServiços jurídicosLack of access to justice, especially for the most vulnerable population, is an urgent problem for countries such as Colombia. Public pro-bono legal aid programs do not seem to offer sufficient or effective services. Other jurisdictions that face the same situation have started adopting different measures that touch upon lawyers' monopoly and the rules that govern the legal services market. This article studies and compiles rulings from the Colombian Constitutional Court that have dealt with these two topics to infer the terms under which the debate of how to promote access to justice through the market will take place in the future.A falta de acesso à justiça, principalmente para as populações mais vulneráveis e com menos recursos econômicos, é um problema urgente na Colômbia. Os sistemas de defensoria pública e serviços pro bono não parecem ser suficientes e efetivos. Em outras jurisdições que também são afetadas por este problema, começaram a adotar diversas medidas que afetam o monopólio que ostentam os advogados e as regras que estruturaram o mercado através do qual oferecem seus serviços. Com o objetivo de prever os termos que vão sustentar o debate na Colômbia sobre como melhorar o acesso à justiça através de modificações ao monopólio dos advogados e a forma de regularização de seu mercado, este artigo reúne e estuda as sentenças do Supremo Tribunal Federal relacionadas com o tema.La falta de acceso a la justicia, sobre todo para las poblaciones más vulnerables y con menos recursos económicos, es un problema urgente en Colombia. Los sistemas de defensoría pública y servicios pro bono no parecen ser suficientes y efectivos. En otras jurisdicciones que también se ven afectadas por este problema se están empezando a adoptar distintas medidas que afectan el monopolio que ostentan los abogados y las reglas que estructuran el mercado a través del cual proveen sus servicios. Con el fin de prever los términos que van a estructurar el debate en Colombia sobre cómo mejorar el acceso a la justicia a través de modificaciones al monopolio de los abogados y la forma que se regula su mercado, este artículo recoge y estudia las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional referentes a la materia.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8409282(Revista) ISSN 0120-1867Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 78, Nº. 172, 2021, pags. 148-174spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 78, Nº. 172, 2021, pags. 148-174
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Acceso a la justicia
profesión jurídica Corte Constitucional abogados servicios jurídicos Access to justice legal profession Constitutional Court Monopoly Legal Services Acesso à justiça Profissão jurídica Supremo Tribunal Federal Advogados Serviços jurídicos |
| spellingShingle |
Acceso a la justicia
profesión jurídica Corte Constitucional abogados servicios jurídicos Access to justice legal profession Constitutional Court Monopoly Legal Services Acesso à justiça Profissão jurídica Supremo Tribunal Federal Advogados Serviços jurídicos Anzola Rodríguez, Sergio Iván Monopolio, mercado de servicios jurídicos y acceso a la justicia: notas para un futuro debate |
| description |
Lack of access to justice, especially for the most vulnerable population, is an urgent problem for countries such as Colombia. Public pro-bono legal aid programs do not seem to offer sufficient or effective services. Other jurisdictions that face the same situation have started adopting different measures that touch upon lawyers' monopoly and the rules that govern the legal services market. This article studies and compiles rulings from the Colombian Constitutional Court that have dealt with these two topics to infer the terms under which the debate of how to promote access to justice through the market will take place in the future.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Anzola Rodríguez, Sergio Iván
|
| author_facet |
Anzola Rodríguez, Sergio Iván
|
| author_sort |
Anzola Rodríguez, Sergio Iván
|
| title |
Monopolio, mercado de servicios jurídicos y acceso a la justicia: notas para un futuro debate
|
| title_short |
Monopolio, mercado de servicios jurídicos y acceso a la justicia: notas para un futuro debate
|
| title_full |
Monopolio, mercado de servicios jurídicos y acceso a la justicia: notas para un futuro debate
|
| title_fullStr |
Monopolio, mercado de servicios jurídicos y acceso a la justicia: notas para un futuro debate
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Monopolio, mercado de servicios jurídicos y acceso a la justicia: notas para un futuro debate
|
| title_sort |
monopolio, mercado de servicios jurídicos y acceso a la justicia: notas para un futuro debate
|
| publishDate |
2021
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8409282
|
| _version_ |
1731474173872570368
|