Las deficiencias formales y pragmáticas de los medios de control constitucional en México

Purpose: In Mexico, there are three means of constitutional control; however, they have been surpassed in terms of their scope and protection due to the fact that there are acts of authority that are not regulated for their control or are expressly prohibited by law. Methodology: In this study, we w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tapia Hernández, Erick Francisco
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8301383
Source:DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, null 23, Nº. 1 (enero-junio), 202135 pags.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001512879
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, null 23, Nº. 1 (enero-junio), 202135 pags.
language
Spanish
topic
unconstitutionality actions
constitutional control
constitutional controversies
amparo trial
acciones de inconstitucionalidad
control constitucional
controversias constitucionales
juicio de amparo
ações de inconstitucionalidade
controle constitucional
controvérsias constitucionais
julgamento amparo
spellingShingle
unconstitutionality actions
constitutional control
constitutional controversies
amparo trial
acciones de inconstitucionalidad
control constitucional
controversias constitucionales
juicio de amparo
ações de inconstitucionalidade
controle constitucional
controvérsias constitucionais
julgamento amparo
Tapia Hernández, Erick Francisco
Las deficiencias formales y pragmáticas de los medios de control constitucional en México
description
Purpose: In Mexico, there are three means of constitutional control; however, they have been surpassed in terms of their scope and protection due to the fact that there are acts of authority that are not regulated for their control or are expressly prohibited by law. Methodology: In this study, we will analyze the scope of the means of constitutional control, which are: constitutional controversies, actions of unconstitutionality and the amparo trial. Findings: We will notice that this is a complex issue to be raised in Mexico, both politically and legally, aggravated by the attempt to adapt somewhat obsolete or at least insufficient figures to the demands of a new system of constitutional justice that every constitutional State should have. This has contributed to the perception of uncertainty in the justice system in Mexico, both in law and in practice, by all the justice operators involved. Conclusions: In the development of this study, we have warned that the justice system for the defense of human rights in Mexico is deficient, particularly in terms of the means of constitutional control both in structure and in normative hypotheses that are absent and others that are even prohibited.
format
Article
author
Tapia Hernández, Erick Francisco
author_facet
Tapia Hernández, Erick Francisco
author_sort
Tapia Hernández, Erick Francisco
title
Las deficiencias formales y pragmáticas de los medios de control constitucional en México
title_short
Las deficiencias formales y pragmáticas de los medios de control constitucional en México
title_full
Las deficiencias formales y pragmáticas de los medios de control constitucional en México
title_fullStr
Las deficiencias formales y pragmáticas de los medios de control constitucional en México
title_full_unstemmed
Las deficiencias formales y pragmáticas de los medios de control constitucional en México
title_sort
las deficiencias formales y pragmáticas de los medios de control constitucional en méxico
publishDate
2021
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8301383
_version_
1725589159949631488
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015128792022-02-22Las deficiencias formales y pragmáticas de los medios de control constitucional en MéxicoTapia Hernández, Erick Franciscounconstitutionality actionsconstitutional controlconstitutional controversiesamparo trialacciones de inconstitucionalidadcontrol constitucionalcontroversias constitucionalesjuicio de amparoações de inconstitucionalidadecontrole constitucionalcontrovérsias constitucionaisjulgamento amparoPurpose: In Mexico, there are three means of constitutional control; however, they have been surpassed in terms of their scope and protection due to the fact that there are acts of authority that are not regulated for their control or are expressly prohibited by law. Methodology: In this study, we will analyze the scope of the means of constitutional control, which are: constitutional controversies, actions of unconstitutionality and the amparo trial. Findings: We will notice that this is a complex issue to be raised in Mexico, both politically and legally, aggravated by the attempt to adapt somewhat obsolete or at least insufficient figures to the demands of a new system of constitutional justice that every constitutional State should have. This has contributed to the perception of uncertainty in the justice system in Mexico, both in law and in practice, by all the justice operators involved. Conclusions: In the development of this study, we have warned that the justice system for the defense of human rights in Mexico is deficient, particularly in terms of the means of constitutional control both in structure and in normative hypotheses that are absent and others that are even prohibited.Objetivo: no México, existem três meios de controle constitucional; entretanto, eles foram superados em termos de seu escopo e proteção devido ao fato de que existem atos de autoridade que não são regulamentados para seu controle ou são expressamente proibidos por lei. Metodologia: neste estudo, analisaremos o escopo dos meios de controle constitucional, que são: controvérsias constitucionais, ações de inconstitucionalidade e o julgamento amparo. Resultados: notaremos que é uma questão complexa a ser levantada no México tanto política quanto juridicamente, agravada pela tentativa de adaptar números algo obsoletos ou pelo menos insuficientes à exigência de um novo sistema de justiça constitucional que todo Estado constitucional deveria ter. Isto contribuiu para o fato de que a justiça no México tem uma percepção de incerteza tanto na lei quanto na prática por parte de todos os operadores de justiça envolvidos. Conclusões: no desenvolvimento deste estudo, advertimos que o sistema judicial para a defesa dos direitos humanos no México é deficiente, particularmente em termos de meios de controle constitucional, tanto na estrutura como nas hipóteses normativas ausentes e outras até mesmo proibidas.Propósito: en México, existen tres medios de control constitucional; sin embargo, han sido superados en cuanto a su alcance y protección debido a que hay actos de autoridad que no están regulados para su control o están prohibidos expresamente por la ley. Metodología: en el presente estudio, analizaremos el alcance de los medios de control constitucional, los cuales son: las controversias constitucionales, las acciones de inconstitucionalidad y el juicio de amparo. Hallazgos: advertiremos que es un tema complejo de plantear en México tanto en lo político como en lo jurídico, agudizado por el intento de adaptar figuras algo obsoletas o por lo menos insuficientes a la exigencia de un nuevo sistema de justicia constitucional que todo Estado constitucional debería tener. Ello ha contribuido a que en México la justicia tenga una percepción de incertidumbre tanto en la ley como en la práctica por todos los operadores de justicia involucrados. Conclusiones: en el desarrollo del presente estudio, hemos advertido que el sistema de justicia para la defensa de derechos humanos en México es deficiente, en particular en cuanto a los medios de control constitucional tanto en estructura como en hipótesis normativas ausentes y otras incluso prohibidas.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8301383(Revista) ISSN 0124-7255DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, null 23, Nº. 1 (enero-junio), 202135 pags. spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI