En defensa de la potestad normativa de la Administración
This article seeks to offer a critique to the idea that rulemaking powers exercised by the Administration are illegitimate or somehow unlawful. I suggest that four “myths” are commonly accepted by a considerable group of scholars devoted to the research of the theory of the State (and, to some exten...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8197085 |
| Source: | Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 51 (enero-abril), 2022, pags. 197-226 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001498504
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014985042021-12-21En defensa de la potestad normativa de la AdministraciónChible Villadangos, PíaRulemaking powerAdministrative Stateseparation of powersenforcement of legal rulesintegrityPotestad normativaEstado administrativoseparación de poderesejecución de normas legalesintegridadThis article seeks to offer a critique to the idea that rulemaking powers exercised by the Administration are illegitimate or somehow unlawful. I suggest that four “myths” are commonly accepted by a considerable group of scholars devoted to the research of the theory of the State (and, to some extent, jurisprudence), and are even sometimes supported by existing constitutional texts. The myths are: 1. Separation of powers requires separation of “types of powers”; 2. The role of the Administration is limited to the enforcement of legal rules; 3. Administrative rulemaking power contradicts moral principles of law, and 4. ‘Enforcement of legal rules’ and ‘creation of rules’ exclude each other. These myths have prevented the elaboration of a strong defense in favor of administrative rulemaking power in the modern State. This is why I present some arguments that allow for their review.El presente artículo pretende criticar la idea de que la creación normativa efectuada por la Administración es ilegítima. Se sugiere que existen cuatro “mitos” que se erigen sobre la base de tesis comúnmente aceptadas por parte relevante de la doctrina dedicada a la teoría del Estado (y, en cierta medida, la teoría del derecho), e incluso a veces respaldada en textos constitucionales vigentes. Los mitos son: 1. La separación de poderes del Estado exige separación de facultades; 2. La función de la Administración se limita a la ejecución de normas legales; 3. La potestad normativa de la Administración es contraria a principios morales del derecho, y 4. ‘Ejecución de normas legales’ y ‘creación normativa’ son mutuamente excluyentes. Estos mitos han impedido la construcción de una defensa sólida en favor de la potestad normativa de la Administración en el Estado moderno, razón por la cual se proponen elementos para su revisión.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8197085(Revista) ISSN 0122-9893Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 51 (enero-abril), 2022, pags. 197-226spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 51 (enero-abril), 2022, pags. 197-226
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Rulemaking power
Administrative State separation of powers enforcement of legal rules integrity Potestad normativa Estado administrativo separación de poderes ejecución de normas legales integridad |
| spellingShingle |
Rulemaking power
Administrative State separation of powers enforcement of legal rules integrity Potestad normativa Estado administrativo separación de poderes ejecución de normas legales integridad Chible Villadangos, Pía En defensa de la potestad normativa de la Administración |
| description |
This article seeks to offer a critique to the idea that rulemaking powers exercised by the Administration are illegitimate or somehow unlawful. I suggest that four “myths” are commonly accepted by a considerable group of scholars devoted to the research of the theory of the State (and, to some extent, jurisprudence), and are even sometimes supported by existing constitutional texts. The myths are: 1. Separation of powers requires separation of “types of powers”; 2. The role of the Administration is limited to the enforcement of legal rules; 3. Administrative rulemaking power contradicts moral principles of law, and 4. ‘Enforcement of legal rules’ and ‘creation of rules’ exclude each other. These myths have prevented the elaboration of a strong defense in favor of administrative rulemaking power in the modern State. This is why I present some arguments that allow for their review.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Chible Villadangos, Pía
|
| author_facet |
Chible Villadangos, Pía
|
| author_sort |
Chible Villadangos, Pía
|
| title |
En defensa de la potestad normativa de la Administración
|
| title_short |
En defensa de la potestad normativa de la Administración
|
| title_full |
En defensa de la potestad normativa de la Administración
|
| title_fullStr |
En defensa de la potestad normativa de la Administración
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
En defensa de la potestad normativa de la Administración
|
| title_sort |
en defensa de la potestad normativa de la administración
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8197085
|
| _version_ |
1719881551070625792
|