Democracia, tolerancia religiosa y libertad de conciencia en Baruch de Spinoza y Pierre Bayle
Benedict of Spinoza and Pierre Bayle are typical modern thinkers who built religious tolerance on the Gnostic subjectivation of faith, the theo- logical rationalism and the absolutism of the State. While one defends the freedom to philosophize and the other the rights of the erroneous conscience, in...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8039502 |
| Source: | Revista Derecho Público Iberoamericano, ISSN 0719-2959, Nº. 17, 2020, pags. 97-136 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001473092
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014730922021-09-07Democracia, tolerancia religiosa y libertad de conciencia en Baruch de Spinoza y Pierre BayleSegovia, Juan FernandoBaruch de SpinozaPierre Bayletolerancia religiosalibertad de filosofarderechos de la conciencia errónearazón de EstadoBenedict of SpinozaPierre BayleReligious toleranceFreedom to philosophizeErroneous consciousness’ rightsReason of the StateBenedict of Spinoza and Pierre Bayle are typical modern thinkers who built religious tolerance on the Gnostic subjectivation of faith, the theo- logical rationalism and the absolutism of the State. While one defends the freedom to philosophize and the other the rights of the erroneous conscience, in both systems the fundamental law is the self-conservation of the State, the modern raison d’ÉtatBaruch de Spinoza y Pierre Bayle son típicos pensadores modernos que construyeron la tolerancia religiosa sobre la subjetivación gnóstica de la fe, el racionalismo teológico y el absolutismo del Estado. A pesar de que uno defiende la libertad de filosofar y otro, los derechos de la conciencia errónea, en ambos sistemas la ley fundamental es la autoconservación del Estado, la moderna raison d’Etat2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8039502(Revista) ISSN 0719-2959Revista Derecho Público Iberoamericano, ISSN 0719-2959, Nº. 17, 2020, pags. 97-136spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Derecho Público Iberoamericano, ISSN 0719-2959, Nº. 17, 2020, pags. 97-136
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Baruch de Spinoza
Pierre Bayle tolerancia religiosa libertad de filosofar derechos de la conciencia errónea razón de Estado Benedict of Spinoza Pierre Bayle Religious tolerance Freedom to philosophize Erroneous consciousness’ rights Reason of the State |
| spellingShingle |
Baruch de Spinoza
Pierre Bayle tolerancia religiosa libertad de filosofar derechos de la conciencia errónea razón de Estado Benedict of Spinoza Pierre Bayle Religious tolerance Freedom to philosophize Erroneous consciousness’ rights Reason of the State Segovia, Juan Fernando Democracia, tolerancia religiosa y libertad de conciencia en Baruch de Spinoza y Pierre Bayle |
| description |
Benedict of Spinoza and Pierre Bayle are typical modern thinkers who built religious tolerance on the Gnostic subjectivation of faith, the theo- logical rationalism and the absolutism of the State. While one defends the freedom to philosophize and the other the rights of the erroneous conscience, in both systems the fundamental law is the self-conservation of the State, the modern raison d’État
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Segovia, Juan Fernando
|
| author_facet |
Segovia, Juan Fernando
|
| author_sort |
Segovia, Juan Fernando
|
| title |
Democracia, tolerancia religiosa y libertad de conciencia en Baruch de Spinoza y Pierre Bayle
|
| title_short |
Democracia, tolerancia religiosa y libertad de conciencia en Baruch de Spinoza y Pierre Bayle
|
| title_full |
Democracia, tolerancia religiosa y libertad de conciencia en Baruch de Spinoza y Pierre Bayle
|
| title_fullStr |
Democracia, tolerancia religiosa y libertad de conciencia en Baruch de Spinoza y Pierre Bayle
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Democracia, tolerancia religiosa y libertad de conciencia en Baruch de Spinoza y Pierre Bayle
|
| title_sort |
democracia, tolerancia religiosa y libertad de conciencia en baruch de spinoza y pierre bayle
|
| publishDate |
2020
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8039502
|
| _version_ |
1710376390321242112
|