Bear creek v. Peru and the legality of the investment as an (implied) requirement for investment arbitration tribunals’ exercise of jurisdiction

Concerns about inconsistency in the application of standards in arbitral awards are strongly present in investment treaty arbitration. In particular, tribunals can regularly exercise a varying scope of jurisdiction when they determine the legality requirement that demands foreign investments t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Talavera Cano, Andrés
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Investment treaty arbitration
Free Trade Agreement
legality requirement
tribunal’s jurisdiction
host State
Arbitraje de inversiones
Tratado de Libre Comercio
requisito de legalidad
jurisdicción del tribunal
Estado receptor
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7882641
Source:THEMIS: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1810-9934, Nº. 77, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Arbitraje), pags. 447-455
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Bear creek v. Peru and the legality of the investment as an (implied) requirement for investment arbitration tribunals’ exercise of jurisdiction
  • Get full text

    • Similar Items