Matices a la interpretación tradicional de la exégesis
It is common among Law Professors to refer to exegesis as a radical movement attached to the literality of the law where there exists only the legislator. This work pretends to ask for the historical truth of such traditional reading by presenting such academic movement in its context with differ...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7512685 |
| Source: | Jurídicas, ISSN 1794-2918, Vol. 9, Nº. 1, 2012, pags. 120-135 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001400890
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Jurídicas, ISSN 1794-2918, Vol. 9, Nº. 1, 2012, pags. 120-135
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Positivismo
exégesis siglo XIX código estatalismo legicentrismo Positivism exegesis XIX Century state ownership law-centrism |
| spellingShingle |
Positivismo
exégesis siglo XIX código estatalismo legicentrismo Positivism exegesis XIX Century state ownership law-centrism Botero Bernal, Andrés Matices a la interpretación tradicional de la exégesis |
| description |
It is common among Law Professors to refer to exegesis as a radical movement
attached to the literality of the law where there exists only the legislator. This work
pretends to ask for the historical truth of such traditional reading by presenting
such academic movement in its context with different shades so that the interested
jurist in the history of his/her profession does not fall ingenuously in either a white
legend or a black legend (being this last one the dominant nowadays) of the exegesis
of the early XIX century. But, why to study a school which appeared so many
years ago? For two reasons: a) because it is time to iuhistory to get articulated with
iuphilosophy in order to allow a better understanding of the past which constitutes
the comprehensive foundation of our discipline. Without purifying or shading
properly the ideological discourses from the legal past, our thought around the
law would get lost in its projection to the future; b) because the contemporary
positivism which has been hardly criticized, has been assimilated with exegesis
thus demanding us to question, now that time allows us to deal with the topic
dispassionately from those who lived it, how true it is what has been said about that
movement, which would allow the reader to answer how correct the designation
which identifies positivism with exegesis is.
Key words
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Botero Bernal, Andrés
|
| author_facet |
Botero Bernal, Andrés
|
| author_sort |
Botero Bernal, Andrés
|
| title |
Matices a la interpretación tradicional de la exégesis
|
| title_short |
Matices a la interpretación tradicional de la exégesis
|
| title_full |
Matices a la interpretación tradicional de la exégesis
|
| title_fullStr |
Matices a la interpretación tradicional de la exégesis
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Matices a la interpretación tradicional de la exégesis
|
| title_sort |
matices a la interpretación tradicional de la exégesis
|
| publishDate |
2012
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7512685
|
| _version_ |
1709752075353587712
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014008902020-07-28Matices a la interpretación tradicional de la exégesisBotero Bernal, AndrésPositivismoexégesissiglo XIXcódigoestatalismolegicentrismoPositivismexegesisXIX Centurystate ownershiplaw-centrismIt is common among Law Professors to refer to exegesis as a radical movement attached to the literality of the law where there exists only the legislator. This work pretends to ask for the historical truth of such traditional reading by presenting such academic movement in its context with different shades so that the interested jurist in the history of his/her profession does not fall ingenuously in either a white legend or a black legend (being this last one the dominant nowadays) of the exegesis of the early XIX century. But, why to study a school which appeared so many years ago? For two reasons: a) because it is time to iuhistory to get articulated with iuphilosophy in order to allow a better understanding of the past which constitutes the comprehensive foundation of our discipline. Without purifying or shading properly the ideological discourses from the legal past, our thought around the law would get lost in its projection to the future; b) because the contemporary positivism which has been hardly criticized, has been assimilated with exegesis thus demanding us to question, now that time allows us to deal with the topic dispassionately from those who lived it, how true it is what has been said about that movement, which would allow the reader to answer how correct the designation which identifies positivism with exegesis is. Key wordsEs común entre los profesores de derecho la referencia a la exégesis como un movimiento radical, apegado a la literalidad de la ley, donde sólo existe el legislador, etc. Este trabajo busca preguntarse por la realidad histórica de dicha lectura tradicional, presentando tal movimiento académico en su contexto, con diferentes matices, para que así el jurista interesado en la historia de su profesión no caiga ingenuamente tanto en una leyenda blanca como en una negra (siendo ésta la dominante en la actualidad) de la exégesis de principios del siglo XIX. ¿Pero por qué estudiar una escuela de hace tantos años? Por dos motivos: a) Porque ya es hora de que la iushistoria se articule con la iusfi losofía para permitir una mejor comprensión del pasado, que se constituye en la base comprensiva de nuestra disciplina. Sin depurar, sin matizar debidamente los discursos ideológicos del pasado jurídico, nuestro pensamiento en torno al derecho se perdería en su proyección hacia el futuro. b) Porque el positivismo contemporáneo, tan duramente criticado, ha sido asimilado, sin más, con la exégesis, lo que nos exige preguntarnos, ahora que el tiempo nos permite abordar este tema sin los apasionamientos de quienes lo vivieron, qué tan cierto es lo que sobre dicho movimiento se ha dicho, lo que permitiría al lector responder qué tan correcto es el señalamiento que identifi ca el positivismo, cualquiera, con la exégesis.2012text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7512685(Revista) ISSN 1794-2918Jurídicas, ISSN 1794-2918, Vol. 9, Nº. 1, 2012, pags. 120-135spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|