Control judicial de la discrecionalidad técnica: error manifiesto, inmediación, sana crítica
In the wake of his commentary on a STS, a well-known administrativist argues that judicial control of technical discretion should be limited to censoring only “manifest error”. Once this is ruled out, possible discrepancies are reduced to the struggle between different technical opinions in which th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6237177 |
| Source: | Revista de administración pública, ISSN 0034-7639, Nº 204, 2017, pags. 11-39 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001374277
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013742772020-04-15Control judicial de la discrecionalidad técnica: error manifiesto, inmediación, sana críticaIgartua Salaverría, JuanDiscrecionalidad técnicaerror manifiestoinmediacióncontrol judicialsana críticaTechnical discretionmanifest errorimmediacyjudicial controlsound criticismIn the wake of his commentary on a STS, a well-known administrativist argues that judicial control of technical discretion should be limited to censoring only “manifest error”. Once this is ruled out, possible discrepancies are reduced to the struggle between different technical opinions in which the Administration has the upper hand, according to the jurisprudence of the high courts. But, in addition, the administrative body is in an advantageous position, closer to reality, because it has directly managed the entire selection process; in contrast, the court of justice has only the version offered by the parties. And to this must be added that the administrative body, being composed of specialized members, offers more guarantees of discernment success than a court with its generic rules of sound criticism. These three themes will be discussed in this paper.Al hilo de su comentario sobre una STS, un reconocido administrativista defiende que el control judicial de la discrecionalidad técnica se limite a censurar únicamente el «error manifiesto». Descartado este, las posibles discrepancias se reducen a la pugna entre distintos pareceres técnicos en la que la Administración lleva las de ganar, según la jurisprudencia de los altos tribunales. Pero es que, además, el órgano administrativo está en una situación ventajosa, más próxima a la realidad, pues ha gestionado directamente todo el proceso selectivo; en cambio, el tribunal de justicia solo cuenta con la versión ofrecida por las partes. Y a ello debe añadirse que el órgano administrativo, al estar compuesto por miembros especializados, ofrece más garantías de acierto que un tribunal con sus genéricas reglas de la sana crítica. Estos tres temas serán sometidos a discusión en el presente trabajo.2017text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6237177(Revista) ISSN 0034-7639Revista de administración pública, ISSN 0034-7639, Nº 204, 2017, pags. 11-39spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista de administración pública, ISSN 0034-7639, Nº 204, 2017, pags. 11-39
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Discrecionalidad técnica
error manifiesto inmediación control judicial sana crítica Technical discretion manifest error immediacy judicial control sound criticism |
| spellingShingle |
Discrecionalidad técnica
error manifiesto inmediación control judicial sana crítica Technical discretion manifest error immediacy judicial control sound criticism Igartua Salaverría, Juan Control judicial de la discrecionalidad técnica: error manifiesto, inmediación, sana crítica |
| description |
In the wake of his commentary on a STS, a well-known administrativist argues that judicial control of technical discretion should be limited to censoring only “manifest error”. Once this is ruled out, possible discrepancies are reduced to the struggle between different technical opinions in which the Administration has the upper hand, according to the jurisprudence of the high courts. But, in addition, the administrative body is in an advantageous position, closer to reality, because it has directly managed the entire selection process; in contrast, the court of justice has only the version offered by the parties. And to this must be added that the administrative body, being composed of specialized members, offers more guarantees of discernment success than a court with its generic rules of sound criticism. These three themes will be discussed in this paper.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Igartua Salaverría, Juan
|
| author_facet |
Igartua Salaverría, Juan
|
| author_sort |
Igartua Salaverría, Juan
|
| title |
Control judicial de la discrecionalidad técnica: error manifiesto, inmediación, sana crítica
|
| title_short |
Control judicial de la discrecionalidad técnica: error manifiesto, inmediación, sana crítica
|
| title_full |
Control judicial de la discrecionalidad técnica: error manifiesto, inmediación, sana crítica
|
| title_fullStr |
Control judicial de la discrecionalidad técnica: error manifiesto, inmediación, sana crítica
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Control judicial de la discrecionalidad técnica: error manifiesto, inmediación, sana crítica
|
| title_sort |
control judicial de la discrecionalidad técnica: error manifiesto, inmediación, sana crítica
|
| publishDate |
2017
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6237177
|
| _version_ |
1709751007282462720
|