O estupro enquanto genocídio no Tribunal Penal Internacional para Ruanda: um estudo do caso Akayesu

This articleintended to study the Akayesu case, judged by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, under a gender pers-pective, more specifically its pioneer decision in International Law to consider that rape can constitute genocide. The aim was to analyze the im-plications of this case to I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Soares Lippi, Camila
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7277386
Source:Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, ISSN 2179-7943, Vol. 15, Nº. 2, 2014 (Ejemplar dedicado a: ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [EJJL]), pags. 287-314
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: This articleintended to study the Akayesu case, judged by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, under a gender pers-pective, more specifically its pioneer decision in International Law to consider that rape can constitute genocide. The aim was to analyze the im-plications of this case to International Law and to the feminist theories of Law, and if those theories are appropriate to explain this phenomenon. The chosen method was to do a case study. This warrants a deeper study of the decision. The primary source used was the judgment, by the Trial Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, of the Akayesu case. Besides this, it was made a bibliographic review not only about the CASE, but also about genocide. It was made, as well, a mapping of the opinions of feminist authors about the Akayesu case and about rape as genocide, in order to verify if the concepts used by those authors are suitable to explain this phenomenon.