Judicial Dialogue and Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America: The Case of Indigenous Peoples and Afro-descendants
This research presents an example of transformative case law from the Inter- American Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Colombia. Due to the fact that these Courts had seriously contemplated the right to free, prior and informed consultation of indigenous peoples and afro-descend...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6893592 |
| Source: | Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 43, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Mayo-Agosto), pags. 191-233 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001320742
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013207422019-04-27Judicial Dialogue and Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America: The Case of Indigenous Peoples and Afro-descendantsHerrera, Juan C.Transformative ConstitutionalismRight to FreePrior and Informed Consent ( fPiC )Indigenous PeoplesAfro-DescendantsConstitutional Court of ColombiaInter-American Court of Human RightsJudicial DialogueConstitucionalismo transformadorderecho a la consulta previalibre e informadapueblos indígenasafrodescendientesCorte Constitucional de ColombiaCorte Interamericana de Derechos Humanosdiálogo judicialThis research presents an example of transformative case law from the Inter- American Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Colombia. Due to the fact that these Courts had seriously contemplated the right to free, prior and informed consultation of indigenous peoples and afro-descendants, this study explains the standards and statistics produced for 25 years on the topic. It focuses on the principal outcomes of the interamerican case Saramaka v. Suriname (2007) and the Colombian Decision T-129 of 2011, which nowadays encompass the most plausible and balanced standard of protection on the matter. However, the progressive outcomes are at risk of being regressively changed. For that reason, this study analyses the relevance of “binding consent” as an alternative to the problematic category or wrongly so-called “veto power”En esta investigación se expone un ejemplo de diálogo judicial y transformador entre la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y la Corte Constitucional de Colombia. En la medida en que estos dos tribunales se han tomado en serio los derechos a la consulta previa, libre e informada de los pueblos indígenas y afrodescendientes, se presentan detalladas tablas con los casos y las estadísticas producidas durante 25 años sobre el tema. La investigación se centra en el histórico precedente de la Corte Interamericana Saramaka v. Suriname (2007) y la sentencia T-129 de 2011 de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia por medio de la cual se profundizó el diálogo judicial y de donde quizá ha surgido el estándar de protección más plausible y equilibrado en la materia, aunque en riesgo de ser modificado regresivamente. De ahí que se puntualice la relevancia del “consentimiento vinculante” como alternativa al mal denominado “poder de veto”.2019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6893592(Revista) ISSN 0122-9893Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 43, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Mayo-Agosto), pags. 191-233engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 43, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Mayo-Agosto), pags. 191-233
|
| language |
English
|
| topic |
Transformative Constitutionalism
Right to Free Prior and Informed Consent ( fPiC ) Indigenous Peoples Afro-Descendants Constitutional Court of Colombia Inter-American Court of Human Rights Judicial Dialogue Constitucionalismo transformador derecho a la consulta previa libre e informada pueblos indígenas afrodescendientes Corte Constitucional de Colombia Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos diálogo judicial |
| spellingShingle |
Transformative Constitutionalism
Right to Free Prior and Informed Consent ( fPiC ) Indigenous Peoples Afro-Descendants Constitutional Court of Colombia Inter-American Court of Human Rights Judicial Dialogue Constitucionalismo transformador derecho a la consulta previa libre e informada pueblos indígenas afrodescendientes Corte Constitucional de Colombia Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos diálogo judicial Herrera, Juan C. Judicial Dialogue and Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America: The Case of Indigenous Peoples and Afro-descendants |
| description |
This research presents an example of transformative case law from the Inter- American Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Colombia. Due to the fact that these Courts had seriously contemplated the right to free, prior and informed consultation of indigenous peoples and afro-descendants, this study explains the standards and statistics produced for 25 years on the topic. It focuses on the principal outcomes of the interamerican case Saramaka v. Suriname (2007) and the Colombian Decision T-129 of 2011, which nowadays encompass the most plausible and balanced standard of protection on the matter. However, the progressive outcomes are at risk of being regressively changed. For that reason, this study analyses the relevance of “binding consent” as an alternative to the problematic category or wrongly so-called “veto power”
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Herrera, Juan C.
|
| author_facet |
Herrera, Juan C.
|
| author_sort |
Herrera, Juan C.
|
| title |
Judicial Dialogue and Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America: The Case of Indigenous Peoples and Afro-descendants
|
| title_short |
Judicial Dialogue and Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America: The Case of Indigenous Peoples and Afro-descendants
|
| title_full |
Judicial Dialogue and Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America: The Case of Indigenous Peoples and Afro-descendants
|
| title_fullStr |
Judicial Dialogue and Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America: The Case of Indigenous Peoples and Afro-descendants
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Judicial Dialogue and Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America: The Case of Indigenous Peoples and Afro-descendants
|
| title_sort |
judicial dialogue and transformative constitutionalism in latin america: the case of indigenous peoples and afro-descendants
|
| publishDate |
2019
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6893592
|
| _version_ |
1709749383224885248
|