Globalização multicultural, direitos universais humanos e socioambientais
The globalization process is related to multiculturalism under an european colonial otic, where west hegemonic cultures subjugated peripheric cultures in a clear racism demonstration. The actual globalisation stage that world lives is related more directly to the capitalist model of economy, where t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6811079 |
| Source: | Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental, ISSN 2179-8214, Vol. 2, Nº. 1, 2011 (Ejemplar dedicado a: janeiro/junho), pags. 11-39 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
The globalization process is related to multiculturalism under an european colonial otic,
where west hegemonic cultures subjugated peripheric cultures in a clear racism demonstration.
The actual globalisation stage that world lives is related more directly to the capitalist
model of economy, where the market logic is individualist, patrimonialist and privatist.
This same logic contributed to the emergence of the National State, a model of politic
organization with an uniforming tendency and vocation of society, based upon an universal
concept of rights, where different human communities, porter of different values and own
visions of the world, were reunited under the same and uniform order, inside an unique
and well defined territory. The globalised market economy favours the contact between
different cultures, as much as in and out the same State. The multicultarilism is considered
a strategy of peripherics peoples and communities to defend themselves from the uniforming
effects of the market economy and its political organism, the National State. There are
two globalization: the west hegemonic, conducted by the capitalist economic system; and
the counter-hegemonic of the dominated cultures, a reaction against the extermination of
local and cultural practices and traditions. The human rights speech is used as hegemonic way pointed toward the capitalist market’s values, and as counter-hegemonic way like
minorities reaction. Before such a plural scenario, this text shows some methods of intercultural
harmonization, the constitutions, state structures and human rights roles, as such
domination instruments, as counter-hegemonic mecanisms. |
|---|