Comentarios sobre la adaptación de los criterios de identificación indígena del Convenio 169 de la OIT en el ordenamiento jurídico peruano
Census 2017 had a controversial question regarding indigenous identity. Media tried to explain it, and intended to help citizens to find their answer. But no one lay out the reason for such a question. The reason is related with the indigenous consciousness criteria stablished at the ILO Convention...
Gorde:
| Egile Nagusiak: | , |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2018
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6754610 |
| Baliabidea: | Derecho & Sociedad, ISSN 2079-3634, Nº. 50, 2018, pags. 221-233 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
Census 2017 had a controversial question regarding indigenous identity. Media tried to explain it, and intended to help citizens to find their answer. But no one lay out the reason for such a question. The reason is related with the indigenous consciousness criteria stablished at the ILO Convention 169, and with the fact that, when the Convention was adapted to Peruvian legal system those criteria were changed. This paper will try to explain that failure implementing the treaty and will suggest a possible solution because the indigenous identity has a major impact on the global indigenous rights, especially regarding their right to prior consultation. |
|---|