Arbitraje: Mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos o privatización judicial1
This paper aims at analyzing arbitration, which has come to be identified as an alternative mechanism for conflict resolution, but that by studying how it has been configured over time, and its current operation, responds to a model of private justice, which is adapted from the very beginning to res...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6226313 |
Source: | Jurídicas CUC, ISSN 1692-3030, Vol. 13, Nº. 1, 2017, pags. 121-146 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001241078
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012410782018-01-20Arbitraje: Mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos o privatización judicial1Maldonado Narváez, Marlon IvánMontaña Cárdenas, Luz AdrianaArbitrajemecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictosprivatización judicialacceso a la justiciaderecho a la igualdadArbitrationAlternative Dispute Settlement Mechanismprivatization of JusticeFreedom of Access to JusticeRight to EqualityThis paper aims at analyzing arbitration, which has come to be identified as an alternative mechanism for conflict resolution, but that by studying how it has been configured over time, and its current operation, responds to a model of private justice, which is adapted from the very beginning to respond to the interests of one sector of the population in particular, such as traders. Through deductive method it was established as general assumptions regarding free access to justice and the right to equality are decimated to an erroneous acceptance of arbitration as an alternative to justice option and not as a mere privatization of the same.En el presente trabajo se pretende realizar un análisis del arbitraje, el cual ha venido siendo identificado como un mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos, pero que al estudiar la forma como se ha configurado a través del tiempo y su funcionamiento actual, responde más a un modelo de justicia privada que se encuentra adaptado desde sus mismos orígenes para responder a los intereses de un sector de la población en especial, como son los comerciantes. A través del método deductivo se logró establecer como presupuestos generales relativos al libre acceso a la justicia y el derecho a la igualdad se ven diezmados ante una aceptación errónea del arbitraje como opción alternativa a la justicia, y no como una mera privatización de la misma. 2017text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6226313(Revista) ISSN 1692-3030Jurídicas CUC, ISSN 1692-3030, Vol. 13, Nº. 1, 2017, pags. 121-146spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Jurídicas CUC, ISSN 1692-3030, Vol. 13, Nº. 1, 2017, pags. 121-146
|
language |
Spanish
|
topic |
Arbitraje
mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos privatización judicial acceso a la justicia derecho a la igualdad Arbitration Alternative Dispute Settlement Mechanism privatization of Justice Freedom of Access to Justice Right to Equality |
spellingShingle |
Arbitraje
mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos privatización judicial acceso a la justicia derecho a la igualdad Arbitration Alternative Dispute Settlement Mechanism privatization of Justice Freedom of Access to Justice Right to Equality Maldonado Narváez, Marlon Iván Montaña Cárdenas, Luz Adriana Arbitraje: Mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos o privatización judicial1 |
description |
This paper aims at analyzing arbitration, which has come to be identified
as an alternative mechanism for conflict resolution, but that
by studying how it has been configured over time, and its current
operation, responds to a model of private justice, which is adapted
from the very beginning to respond to the interests of one sector
of the population in particular, such as traders. Through deductive
method it was established as general assumptions regarding free
access to justice and the right to equality are decimated to an erroneous
acceptance of arbitration as an alternative to justice option
and not as a mere privatization of the same.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Maldonado Narváez, Marlon Iván
Montaña Cárdenas, Luz Adriana |
author_facet |
Maldonado Narváez, Marlon Iván
Montaña Cárdenas, Luz Adriana |
author_sort |
Maldonado Narváez, Marlon Iván
|
title |
Arbitraje: Mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos o privatización judicial1
|
title_short |
Arbitraje: Mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos o privatización judicial1
|
title_full |
Arbitraje: Mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos o privatización judicial1
|
title_fullStr |
Arbitraje: Mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos o privatización judicial1
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Arbitraje: Mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos o privatización judicial1
|
title_sort |
arbitraje: mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos o privatización judicial1
|
publishDate |
2017
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6226313
|
_version_ |
1709746464469549056
|