Arbitraje y prueba pericial
Expert evidence is a controversial question in arbitration, where discussions on how expert evidence should be regulated to achieve that arbitrators receive expert opinions as independent as possible is the usual practice. But it is being forgotten that, strictly speaking, the parties are the ones t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6119768 |
| Source: | Revista de Derecho: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Uruguay, ISSN 1510-3714, Nº. 13, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho), pags. 33-86 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001219431
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista de Derecho: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Uruguay, ISSN 1510-3714, Nº. 13, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho), pags. 33-86
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Law
arbitration expert liability confidentiality arbitraje perito responsabilidad confidencialidad |
| spellingShingle |
Law
arbitration expert liability confidentiality arbitraje perito responsabilidad confidencialidad Pujol, Óscar Franco Jiménez Blanco, Gonzalo Arbitraje y prueba pericial |
| description |
Expert evidence is a controversial question in arbitration, where discussions on how expert evidence should be regulated to achieve that arbitrators receive expert opinions as independent as possible is the usual practice. But it is being forgotten that, strictly speaking, the parties are the ones that designate their own experts and also the ones that could lose the most if the Arbitral Tribunal rejects an expert's arguments due to his or her lack of impartiality. For that reason, this article analyses the grounds why expert evidence is mistrusted, the solutions continuously offered to this respect and their efficiency. In conclusion, it is stated that the most relevant solution to give validity to expert evidence is the existence of mechanisms that enable both the parties and the Arbitral Tribunal to call into question the experts' opinions.On the other hand, the interest aroused by what has been mentioned above involves that other relevant topics receive less attention. Therefore, this article also studies questions related to expert evidence such as confidentiality, the assessment of evidence and the experts' liability, among others.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Pujol, Óscar Franco
Jiménez Blanco, Gonzalo |
| author_facet |
Pujol, Óscar Franco
Jiménez Blanco, Gonzalo |
| author_sort |
Pujol, Óscar Franco
|
| title |
Arbitraje y prueba pericial
|
| title_short |
Arbitraje y prueba pericial
|
| title_full |
Arbitraje y prueba pericial
|
| title_fullStr |
Arbitraje y prueba pericial
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Arbitraje y prueba pericial
|
| title_sort |
arbitraje y prueba pericial
|
| publishDate |
2016
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6119768
|
| _version_ |
1709746318904131584
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012194312017-10-03Arbitraje y prueba pericialPujol, Óscar FrancoJiménez Blanco, GonzaloLawarbitrationexpert liabilityconfidentialityarbitrajeperitoresponsabilidadconfidencialidadExpert evidence is a controversial question in arbitration, where discussions on how expert evidence should be regulated to achieve that arbitrators receive expert opinions as independent as possible is the usual practice. But it is being forgotten that, strictly speaking, the parties are the ones that designate their own experts and also the ones that could lose the most if the Arbitral Tribunal rejects an expert's arguments due to his or her lack of impartiality. For that reason, this article analyses the grounds why expert evidence is mistrusted, the solutions continuously offered to this respect and their efficiency. In conclusion, it is stated that the most relevant solution to give validity to expert evidence is the existence of mechanisms that enable both the parties and the Arbitral Tribunal to call into question the experts' opinions.On the other hand, the interest aroused by what has been mentioned above involves that other relevant topics receive less attention. Therefore, this article also studies questions related to expert evidence such as confidentiality, the assessment of evidence and the experts' liability, among others.La prueba pericial genera una continua controversia en el mundo arbitral, siendo habitual el debate sobre de qué forma debería ser regulada dicha prueba a los efectos de que los árbitros reciban opiniones de expertos lo más imparciales posibles, olvidando con ello que, en puridad, son las partes quienes designan a sus propios peritos y quienes más pueden llegar a perder si el Tribunal Arbitral rechaza los argumentos de un perito por su falta de imparcialidad. Es por ello que en el presente artículo se analizarán los motivos por los que se recela de la prueba pericial, las continuas soluciones que se han ofrecido al respecto y la eficacia de dichas supuestas soluciones, para concluir finalmente que lo más relevante a los efectos de imprimir validez a una prueba pericial es la existencia de mecanismos que permitan a las partes y al Tribunal Arbitral poner en entredicho las manifestaciones vertidas por los peritos. Por otro lado, el interés que siempre genera lo anterior conlleva que se le preste menos atención a otras temáticas que también son muy relevantes, por lo que en el presente artículo también se estudiarán cuestiones relativas a la prueba pericial tales como, entre otras, la confidencialidad, la valoración de la prueba y la responsabilidad de los peritos.2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6119768(Revista) ISSN 1510-3714Revista de Derecho: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Uruguay, ISSN 1510-3714, Nº. 13, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho), pags. 33-86spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|