“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais

A semiotic analysis of the arguments brought to light by the 9th Criminal Chamber of São Paulo’s Court of Appeal when compared to the paradigmatic judgments of the Supreme Court in criminal proceedings harvest, dealing specifically with the presumption of innocence and the individualization of punis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonçalves Alcântara, Guilherme, Prado, Florestan
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5870976
Source:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, null 3, Nº. 1, 2017, pags. 343-364
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001146429
record_format
dialnet
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00011464292017-03-18“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciaisGonçalves Alcântara, GuilhermePrado, FlorestanTheoretical common sense of juristsconstitutional hermeneuticsgarantismpunitivismprecedentsSenso comum teórico dos juristashermenêutica constitucionalgarantismopunitivismoprecedentesA semiotic analysis of the arguments brought to light by the 9th Criminal Chamber of São Paulo’s Court of Appeal when compared to the paradigmatic judgments of the Supreme Court in criminal proceedings harvest, dealing specifically with the presumption of innocence and the individualization of punishment. We used the phenomenological method to bring to São Paulo judicial practice a hermeneutic constraint directed to judicial solipsism.Uma análise semiótica dos argumentos trazidos à luz pela 9ª Câmara de Direito Criminal do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo quando frente aos julgamentos paradigmáticos do Supremo Tribunal Federal em seara processual penal, especificamente tratando da presunção de inocência e da individualização da pena. Utilizou-se o método fenomenológico para trazer à práxis judiciária paulista um constrangimento hermenêutico dirigido ao solipsismo judicial.2017text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5870976(Revista) ISSN 2525-510XRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, null 3, Nº. 1, 2017, pags. 343-364porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, null 3, Nº. 1, 2017, pags. 343-364
language
Portuguese
topic
Theoretical common sense of jurists
constitutional hermeneutics
garantism
punitivism
precedents
Senso comum teórico dos juristas
hermenêutica constitucional
garantismo
punitivismo
precedentes
spellingShingle
Theoretical common sense of jurists
constitutional hermeneutics
garantism
punitivism
precedents
Senso comum teórico dos juristas
hermenêutica constitucional
garantismo
punitivismo
precedentes
Gonçalves Alcântara, Guilherme
Prado, Florestan
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
description
A semiotic analysis of the arguments brought to light by the 9th Criminal Chamber of São Paulo’s Court of Appeal when compared to the paradigmatic judgments of the Supreme Court in criminal proceedings harvest, dealing specifically with the presumption of innocence and the individualization of punishment. We used the phenomenological method to bring to São Paulo judicial practice a hermeneutic constraint directed to judicial solipsism.
format
Article
author
Gonçalves Alcântara, Guilherme
Prado, Florestan
author_facet
Gonçalves Alcântara, Guilherme
Prado, Florestan
author_sort
Gonçalves Alcântara, Guilherme
title
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
title_short
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
title_full
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
title_fullStr
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
title_full_unstemmed
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
title_sort
“'the constitution means what the supreme court says it means'... mas só quando eu quero!” sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
publishDate
2017
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5870976
_version_
1709745577137274880