“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
A semiotic analysis of the arguments brought to light by the 9th Criminal Chamber of São Paulo’s Court of Appeal when compared to the paradigmatic judgments of the Supreme Court in criminal proceedings harvest, dealing specifically with the presumption of innocence and the individualization of punis...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5870976 |
Source: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, null 3, Nº. 1, 2017, pags. 343-364 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001146429
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00011464292017-03-18“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciaisGonçalves Alcântara, GuilhermePrado, FlorestanTheoretical common sense of juristsconstitutional hermeneuticsgarantismpunitivismprecedentsSenso comum teórico dos juristashermenêutica constitucionalgarantismopunitivismoprecedentesA semiotic analysis of the arguments brought to light by the 9th Criminal Chamber of São Paulo’s Court of Appeal when compared to the paradigmatic judgments of the Supreme Court in criminal proceedings harvest, dealing specifically with the presumption of innocence and the individualization of punishment. We used the phenomenological method to bring to São Paulo judicial practice a hermeneutic constraint directed to judicial solipsism.Uma análise semiótica dos argumentos trazidos à luz pela 9ª Câmara de Direito Criminal do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo quando frente aos julgamentos paradigmáticos do Supremo Tribunal Federal em seara processual penal, especificamente tratando da presunção de inocência e da individualização da pena. Utilizou-se o método fenomenológico para trazer à práxis judiciária paulista um constrangimento hermenêutico dirigido ao solipsismo judicial.2017text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5870976(Revista) ISSN 2525-510XRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, null 3, Nº. 1, 2017, pags. 343-364porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, null 3, Nº. 1, 2017, pags. 343-364
|
language |
Portuguese
|
topic |
Theoretical common sense of jurists
constitutional hermeneutics garantism punitivism precedents Senso comum teórico dos juristas hermenêutica constitucional garantismo punitivismo precedentes |
spellingShingle |
Theoretical common sense of jurists
constitutional hermeneutics garantism punitivism precedents Senso comum teórico dos juristas hermenêutica constitucional garantismo punitivismo precedentes Gonçalves Alcântara, Guilherme Prado, Florestan “'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais |
description |
A semiotic analysis of the arguments brought to light by the 9th Criminal Chamber of São Paulo’s Court of Appeal when compared to the paradigmatic judgments of the Supreme Court in criminal proceedings harvest, dealing specifically with the presumption of innocence and the individualization of punishment. We used the phenomenological method to bring to São Paulo judicial practice a hermeneutic constraint directed to judicial solipsism.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Gonçalves Alcântara, Guilherme
Prado, Florestan |
author_facet |
Gonçalves Alcântara, Guilherme
Prado, Florestan |
author_sort |
Gonçalves Alcântara, Guilherme
|
title |
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
|
title_short |
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
|
title_full |
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
|
title_fullStr |
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
|
title_full_unstemmed |
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means'... Mas só quando eu quero!” Sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
|
title_sort |
“'the constitution means what the supreme court says it means'... mas só quando eu quero!” sobre como (não) trabalhar com precedentes judiciais
|
publishDate |
2017
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5870976
|
_version_ |
1709745577137274880
|