The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction

dialnet-ar-18-ART0000735227

dialnet

dialnet-ar-18-ART00007352272022-12-14The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdictionZhang, HuangReglamento Bruselas I bislitispendenciaefecto reflejocompetencia judicial internacional exclusivapacto de elección de foroConvenio entre la UE y ChinaThe new regime of lis pendens in Regulation Brussels I bis has extended its application to the third states including China. This may be a challenge to Chinese jurisdiction since it has not established a uniform criterion to deal with lis pendens. However, the provisions regarding the relation with third states in the new regime of lis pendens still need further examination. Besides, the unilateral statement in the Regulation may be unfair from the Chinese perspective. In this way, it may be relevant for the Chinese and the EU legislators to seek a solution through the establishment of a bilateral Convention that is specialized at dealing with the regime of lis pendens.El nuevo régimen de la litispendencia en el Reglamento Bruselas I bis extiende su aplicación a los terceros países, entre los que se incluye China. Esta extensión constituye un reto para la jurisdicción china a causa de la ausencia de un criterio uniforme en cuanto a la litispendencia en el Derecho chino. La aplicación de las normas en el Reglamento Bruselas I bis merece una atenta consideración ya que el tratamiento unilateral que realiza este Reglamento puede considerarse injusto desde la perspectiva china. Es por esto que se propone como solución el establecimiento de un convenio bilateral entre la UE y China en materia de la litispendencia.Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales2014text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4958052(Revista) ISSN 1697-5197Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI), ISSN 1697-5197, Nº. 28, 201420 pags. engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI), ISSN 1697-5197, Nº. 28, 201420 pags.

English

Reglamento Bruselas I bis
litispendencia
efecto reflejo
competencia judicial internacional exclusiva
pacto de elección de foro
Convenio entre la UE y China

Reglamento Bruselas I bis
litispendencia
efecto reflejo
competencia judicial internacional exclusiva
pacto de elección de foro
Convenio entre la UE y China
Zhang, Huang
The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction

The new regime of lis pendens in Regulation Brussels I bis has extended its application to the third states including China. This may be a challenge to Chinese jurisdiction since it has not established a uniform criterion to deal with lis pendens. However, the provisions regarding the relation with third states in the new regime of lis pendens still need further examination. Besides, the unilateral statement in the Regulation may be unfair from the Chinese perspective. In this way, it may be relevant for the Chinese and the EU legislators to seek a solution through the establishment of a bilateral Convention that is specialized at dealing with the regime of lis pendens.

Article

Zhang, Huang

Zhang, Huang

Zhang, Huang

The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction

The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction

The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction

The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction

The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction

new lispendens regime in the regulation brussels i bis and the challenge met by chinese jurisdiction

Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales

2014

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4958052

1752330413368410112