La opinión consultiva de la corte internacional de justicia sobre Kosovo de 22 de julio de 2010: una interpretación judicial sui generis para un caso que no lo es. Aplicabilidad de la cláusula de salvaguardia de la resolución 2625 (XXV) o de la "secesión como remedio"

In the author's opinion, pressured by the fear of the States to be extrapolated the decision to other contexts all around the world, in which there are secessionist claims, the Court has squandered a unique opportunity to rule on the current scope of two key principles of contemporary international... Deskribapen osoa

Egile nagusia: Soroeta Liceras, Juan
Formatua: Artikulua
Hizkuntza: Gaztelania
Argitaratua: Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales 2013
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4371409
Etiketak: Erantsi etiketa bat
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
Azalaren irudirik gabe QR Kodea
Gorde:
Laburpena: In the author's opinion, pressured by the fear of the States to be extrapolated the decision to other contexts all around the world, in which there are secessionist claims, the Court has squandered a unique opportunity to rule on the current scope of two key principles of contemporary international law: territorial integrity of States and self-determination of peoples. This article defends the right of selfdetermination of Kosovo, under the safeguard clause in Resolution 2625 (XXV) of the General Assembly of the United Nations, as "remedial secession", and does not consider that it is a sui generis case, but an exception to the general principle applies wherever a State prevents the exercise of internal selfdetermination of a people living in its territory.