El ordenamiento territorial en la Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de 1991: lectura socio-jurídica desde el nivel intermedio de gobierno
The Constitution of 1991, result of various political forces, returned to the unitary model; encoding in this again the tense relationship between center State and periphery. The territorial model and the role of the intermediate level were slightly changed with regard to its predecessor, the Consti...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Castellano |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Medellín
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3995580 |
| Fuente: | Opinión Jurídica: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Medellín, ISSN 1692-2530, Vol. 11, Nº. 21, 2012, pags. 19-38 |
| Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
| Sumario: |
The Constitution of 1991, result of various political forces, returned to the unitary
model; encoding in this again the tense relationship between center State and
periphery. The territorial model and the role of the intermediate level were slightly
changed with regard to its predecessor, the Constitution of 1886. The National
Constitutional Convention, despite the fact that had federal and regional proposals,
opted for the unitary model, arguing severe fears of fragmentation and leadership
of illegal armed groups in then territories. Undoubtedly, a great moment wasted
on account of fears. Five ideas were reiterated in the constitutional debates:
autonomy of the territorial organizations, intensification of decentralization,
economic strengthening of territorial entities, setting up of the municipality as
a fundamental core of the state, and participatory democracy; this of course, in
the context and under the limitations of the unitary State. |
|---|