¿Puede estar la ciencia jurídica más allá de la heterosexualidad?
This article examines the criticism of scientific discourse, feminist theory and conventional legal interpretations related to legal disputes arising from the emotional relationships between same-sex couples. The first chapter outlines three starting points for discourse analysis with a focus on non...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores
2011
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3711976 |
| Baliabidea: | Revista Via Iuris, ISSN 1909-5759, Nº. 10, 2011, pags. 115-131 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
This article examines the criticism of scientific discourse,
feminist theory and conventional legal interpretations
related to legal disputes arising from the
emotional relationships between same-sex couples.
The first chapter outlines three starting points for
discourse analysis with a focus on non-heterosexual
gender which are useful for a hermeneutical analysis
of sentences, legal doctrine and norms that concern
same-sex couples. The second chapter presents
the thinking of feminist theorists, especially queer
theorists, about the way in which �heterosexual thinking�
operates and how it is compulsory in Law. The
third and concluding chapter is based on the results
previously presented and proposes a theoretical framework
for a gender-based reading of the principle
schools of legal interpretation which recognizes the
diversity of couples that exist in society. |
|---|