Entrada en vigor y ejercicio por la corte penal internacional de la jurisdicción sobre el crimen de agresión
The adoption of the Resolution about the crime of aggression at Kampala Conference does not entail the immediate Court´s exercise of jurisdiction over the crime; on the contrary, the Resolution establishes a seven years delay and a complicate regime that make difficult the exercise of jurisdiction....
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4371483 |
Source: | Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI), ISSN 1697-5197, Nº. 25, 201324 pags. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Summary: |
The adoption of the Resolution about the crime of aggression at Kampala Conference does not
entail the immediate Court´s exercise of jurisdiction over the crime; on the contrary, the Resolution
establishes a seven years delay and a complicate regime that make difficult the exercise of jurisdiction. The
Resolution opts for article 121.5 of the Statute to establish the entry into force and exercise of jurisdiction
mechanisms which has generated different interpretations on the Court´s competence over nationals of
States that has not accepted the amendment and over the crimes committed in such States. It will be
necessary to analyze the previous work and the States´ positions during the Conference to find out an
accurate interpretation of the provisions. |
---|