TY  - JOUR
T1  - Cuestiones prejudiciales en la unión europea y consultas prejudiciales en la comunidad andina: similitudes, diferencias e influencias
A1  - Cienfuegos Mateo, Manuel
PB  - Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales
YR  - 2013
UL  - http://biblioteca.ararteko.eus/Record/dialnet-ar-18-ART0000575993
AB  - The objective of this research is to compare the legal regime of the European Union
preliminary ruling procedure and the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure. To this
end, the current normative and the functioning in practice of both procedural instruments are described,
focusing the analysis on the more important aspects, such as their nature; legal standing as well as
powers of national jurisdictions; competences of the European and the Andean Courts of Justice in every
preliminary procedure; procedural aspects and, finally, legal effects of preliminary rulings and remedies
to their breach. Following the explanation of the Andean preliminary consultation procedure, the main
similarities and differences between these two judicial cooperation mechanisms will be noted in order to
offer, at the end of the study, some conjectures for the significant influence of the European preliminary
ruling on that.
KW  - Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea
KW  - cuestiones prejudiciales
KW  - Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina
KW  - consultas prejudiciales
KW  - comparación
KW  - Court of Justice of the European Union
KW  - preliminary rulings procedure
KW  - Court of Justice of the Andean Community
KW  - preliminary consultation procedure
KW  - comparison
ER  -