Cuestiones prejudiciales en la unión europea y consultas prejudiciales en la comunidad andina: similitudes, diferencias e influencias
The objective of this research is to compare the legal regime of the European Union preliminary ruling procedure and the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure. To this end, the current normative and the functioning in practice of both procedural instruments are described, focusing the...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4370614 |
Source: | Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales, ISSN 1697-5197, Nº. 25, 201343 pags. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Summary: |
The objective of this research is to compare the legal regime of the European Union
preliminary ruling procedure and the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure. To this
end, the current normative and the functioning in practice of both procedural instruments are described,
focusing the analysis on the more important aspects, such as their nature; legal standing as well as
powers of national jurisdictions; competences of the European and the Andean Courts of Justice in every
preliminary procedure; procedural aspects and, finally, legal effects of preliminary rulings and remedies
to their breach. Following the explanation of the Andean preliminary consultation procedure, the main
similarities and differences between these two judicial cooperation mechanisms will be noted in order to
offer, at the end of the study, some conjectures for the significant influence of the European preliminary
ruling on that. |
---|