Cuestiones prejudiciales en la unión europea y consultas prejudiciales en la comunidad andina: similitudes, diferencias e influencias

The objective of this research is to compare the legal regime of the European Union preliminary ruling procedure and the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure. To this end, the current normative and the functioning in practice of both procedural instruments are described, focusing the... Deskribapen osoa

Egile nagusia: Cienfuegos Mateo, Manuel
Formatua: Artikulua
Hizkuntza: Gaztelania
Argitaratua: Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales 2013
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4370614
Etiketak: Erantsi etiketa bat
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
Azalaren irudirik gabe QR Kodea
Gorde:
Laburpena: The objective of this research is to compare the legal regime of the European Union preliminary ruling procedure and the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure. To this end, the current normative and the functioning in practice of both procedural instruments are described, focusing the analysis on the more important aspects, such as their nature; legal standing as well as powers of national jurisdictions; competences of the European and the Andean Courts of Justice in every preliminary procedure; procedural aspects and, finally, legal effects of preliminary rulings and remedies to their breach. Following the explanation of the Andean preliminary consultation procedure, the main similarities and differences between these two judicial cooperation mechanisms will be noted in order to offer, at the end of the study, some conjectures for the significant influence of the European preliminary ruling on that.