Competencia judicial internacional en defecto de pacto en los contratos de distribución europeos: el contrato de distribución como contrato de prestación de servicios en el reglamento 44

European operators use to launch distributorship agreements without prior written execution of a contract itself. This implies that, in case of conflict arising from this relation, it is necessary to apply the rules of Brussels I Regulation provided for the absence of a choice by the parties. As a r... Deskribapen osoa

Egile nagusia: Cebrian Salvat, María Asunción
Formatua: Artikulua
Hizkuntza: Gaztelania
Argitaratua: Universidad Carlos III: Área de Derecho Internacional Privado. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. 2013
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4182858
Etiketak: Erantsi etiketa bat
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
Azalaren irudirik gabe QR Kodea
Gorde:
Laburpena: European operators use to launch distributorship agreements without prior written execution of a contract itself. This implies that, in case of conflict arising from this relation, it is necessary to apply the rules of Brussels I Regulation provided for the absence of a choice by the parties. As a result, the plaintiff shall choose between the general forum of the defendant�s domicile and the special forum regarding to contracts, set out in article 5.1. The aforementioned article establishes a regime of different forums, depending on the kind of contract. In this paper, after analyzing the different possibilities, we support the consideration of the distributorship agreement as a contract for the provision of services within the meaning of article 5.1. As a consequence, the plaintiff shall be able to sue the other party of a distributorship agreement in the Courts of the place where, under the contract, the services were provided or should have been provided.