VIOLACIONES DE DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES POR LOS TRIBUNALES DE JUSTICIA: RECURSO DE PROTECCIÓN Y DE AMPARO ESPAÑOL. UN ANÁLISIS COMPARADO

This paper tackles one of the most problematic aspects of the Chilean appeal for the protection of constitutional rights, namely, whether the appeal can be filed against court decisions. The Chilean appeal is compared to a Spanish similar recourse, and from the identification of the differences in t... Deskribapen osoa

Egile nagusia: Palomo Vélez, Diego I.
Formatua: Artikulua
Hizkuntza: Gaztelania
Argitaratua: Universidad de Talca 2003
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=2266695
Etiketak: Erantsi etiketa bat
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
Azalaren irudirik gabe QR Kodea
Gorde:
Laburpena: This paper tackles one of the most problematic aspects of the Chilean appeal for the protection of constitutional rights, namely, whether the appeal can be filed against court decisions. The Chilean appeal is compared to a Spanish similar recourse, and from the identification of the differences in this point between Chilean and Spanish a thesis is advanced according to which the appeal for the protection of constitutional rights can be filed against judicial decisions only in exceptional cases.