El amparo constitucional contra los actos de la administración del Estado en Iberoamérica: un análisis comparado con el recurso de protección chileno

This article offers a comparative study of the Chilean recourse about violation of constitutional rights and their equivalents in the Mexican, Argentine and Spanish constitutional systems, with particular reference to the complaints against the administrative decisions. After a general overview of t... Deskribapen osoa

Egile nagusia: Ferrada Bórquez, Juan Carlos
Beste egile batzuk: Bordalí Salamanca, Andrés, Cazor Aliste, Kamel
Formatua: Artikulua
Hizkuntza: Gaztelania
Argitaratua: Universidad de Talca 2004
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=2262166
Etiketak: Erantsi etiketa bat
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
Azalaren irudirik gabe QR Kodea
Gorde:
Laburpena: This article offers a comparative study of the Chilean recourse about violation of constitutional rights and their equivalents in the Mexican, Argentine and Spanish constitutional systems, with particular reference to the complaints against the administrative decisions. After a general overview of these judicial procedures, the article proceeds to analyze the legal cases for which the recourse is granted, and the types of administrative decisions subject to this control. Next, we study the different kinds of petitions available to complainants. Finally, procedural matters are analyzed in more detail. A distinction is proposed between these constitutional recourses and the ordinary control procedures against administrative decisions, and their relationships, and conceptual differences, are explored in light of Comparative Law.