Identificación y prevención de riesgos de origen químico en centros laborales de Santiago de Cuba

In the TOXMED Occupational Health Service, we sought to identify current chemical risks and analyze their association with work conditions in 11 work centers. Information was obtained on the chemical composition of the substances, their uses, associated hazards and toxicities, duration of exposure,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fong Lores, Onel, Ivette Rojas, Evelyn, Domínguez Odio, Aníbal, Rodríguez Tilo, José Carlos, Macías Peacok, Beatriz, García Cabrera, Liset, Berenguer Rivas, Clara Azalea, Clapé Laffita, Oneyda
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Instituto de Altos Estudios en Salud Pública "Dr. Arnaldo Gabaldón" 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=2046091
Source:Salud de los Trabajadores, ISSN 1315-0138, Vol. 14, Nº. 1, 2006, pags. 71-76
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: In the TOXMED Occupational Health Service, we sought to identify current chemical risks and analyze their association with work conditions in 11 work centers. Information was obtained on the chemical composition of the substances, their uses, associated hazards and toxicities, duration of exposure, direct and indirect exposures to the chemical substances, use of personal protective equipment, occupational hygiene measures, the presence of natural or artificial ventilation and other technical characteristics of the productive process. The most common chemicals were hydrocarbons, metals, acids, and alkalis; there was evidence of widespread incorrect use of petroleum derivatives. Carcinogenic substances, inhalation hazards, corrosives, irritants, oxidizers, flammable compounds and a mutagen were identified. Regarding work conditions, the absence of personal protective equipment (41.84%) was most commonly reported, followed by non-compliance with occupational hygiene measures (28,57%), and, lastly, inadequate ventilation and emissions of chemical substances (16.32%). This assessment of occupational risk allowed the evaluation of chemical hazards, and a qualitative assessment of potential risk by job, previously not evaluated from a toxicological perspective, as well as compliance with recommended preventive practices to decrease the negative impact of chemical exposures on worker health.